Driver: San Francisco

another 'brilliant' review from spong. guys, you can't write. that's why no one visits here apart from to see how bad your next article is.

Bad. Very. L2write articles.

What a s**tty article. Nothing interesting here. Did you ever play a video game before this one ?

Hi there,

I'd welcome any constructive comments on why you all feel that this review wasn't up to your standards.

You can either comment here or email me directly at tim@spong.com with your considered thoughts on how, as readers, you think that we can improve.

That's it. No snark. No defensiveness; simply tell us what has upset you so much and we'll see what we can do.

Cheers

Tim

@you_suck It would be remiss of SPOnG to take writing criticism from a guy who cannot even capitalise correctly.

@you_suck / @lol, -Boo / @Franz In isolation I suppose this article might look a bit lacking, which suggests you didn't bother read other other, very in-depth previews the author produced (and linked to, clearly stating he wasn't going to repeat himself). Did you really want to read stuff you've already read? Or was it that the 93% score wasn't high enough?

The article smells like u where sponsored to write this. No offence.

But I do take offence. I seriously do.

It is getting to the point where it seems to me that people seriously think:

1) Enthusing over something good = being paid off.
2) Slamming something rubbish = being paid off by a competing publisher.

We are NEVER 'sponsored' in editorial.

If we were, we would state: Advertorial in the header and we would not award a review score nor call it criticism, review or preview.

If we took paid copy, a publisher would have to pay us way over advertising rates for such Advertorial. Also, it would be clearly marked as such for the reader.

It's a simple equation you see: if readers don't trust you, they won't read, they will go away.

No offence.

Tim

Hey its an awesome review of an awesome game, dont care what anybody says.