Topic started: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:23
Click here to view the editorial this topic refers to.
Page:«12
config
Joined 3 Sep 1999
2088 comments
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:23
"you get to a point that's not unlike de Blob, with colour being added to a broken and graying cityscape as you go."

de-bloody-Blob?

It's an idea that's been around since Wizball on the C64, dammit. Which makes this some sort of Wizball/Katamari offspring

deBlob. FFS.

robot bastard
Anonymous
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:58
“This looks like the game equivalent of a Murakami novel – long, soporific and slow.”
please think before you post things like this as it is painfully not true murakami is a fantastic writer and far form soporific

yes im a gamer and a seasoned reader
SPInGSPOnG
Joined 24 Jan 2004
1149 comments
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:05
robot bastard wrote:
please think before you post things like this as it is painfully not true murakami is a fantastic writer and far form soporific

yes im a gamer and a seasoned reader

I like the fact that you have posted to wave your literary credentials, but you are unable to manage basic grammar, punctuation and spelling.

My guess is that you read Murakami in the same way kids at my school used to read Hubert Selby, without any real joy or comprehension (or much actual completing of the books)... more just to be seen with the book.


Fluver
Anonymous
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:35
Hi may be you are interested in the following site named F****t.Do viait the site

Lisa

www.f***r.com

[12 Feb 2009, 09:52: Message edited by 'config' - unlikely. In future, please pay for your Valentine's spam]
Disappointed Lover
Anonymous
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:27
Fluver wrote:
Hi may be you are interested in the following site named F****t.Do viait the site
[12 Feb 2009, 09:52: Message edited by 'config' - unlikely. In future, please pay for your Valentine's spam]


Hold on I was interested in what Lisa had to say you fascists!! Now what do I do for Valentine's Day? I suppose I'll have to read "Supûtoniku no koibito" again. Zzzzz.
micta
Joined 2 Nov 1999
163 comments
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:19
Rod Todd wrote:


My guess is that you read Murakami in the same way kids at my school used to read Hubert Selby, without any real joy or comprehension (or much actual completing of the books)... more just to be seen with the book.




You mention Hubert Selby and the phrase 'real joy' in the same sentence. I never thought i'd see that. Mind, like, officially blown, man.
robot bastard
Anonymous
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:41

"I like the fact that you have posted to wave your literary credentials, but you are unable to manage basic grammar, punctuation and spelling.

My guess is that you read Murakami in the same way kids at my school used to read Hubert Selby, without any real joy or comprehension (or much actual completing of the books)... more just to be seen with the book."
no just no
i was very tired when i posted that and i refuse to apoligise for my poor english
however i truly do enjoy murakami's books and those by many others
Harry Black
Anonymous
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:02
micta wrote:
You mention Hubert Selby and the phrase 'real joy' in the same sentence. I never thought i'd see that. Mind, like, officially blown, man.

If you don't really enjoy reading him. Don't read him.

If you do really enjoy reading him, then there's the real joy. What's so, like, mindblowing?
sue_raas
Joined 26 Jan 2004
113 comments
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:45
Harry Black wrote:
micta wrote:
You mention Hubert Selby and the phrase 'real joy' in the same sentence. I never thought i'd see that. Mind, like, officially blown, man.

If you don't really enjoy reading him. Don't read him.

If you do really enjoy reading him, then there's the real joy. What's so, like, mindblowing?


I think the poster is inferring that there is little to no joy in Selbys stories, not even for characters who commit murder just to see what it feels like, or keep a cop tied up in the garage like a dog. Or any other 'bad' behaviour you might find in his books. Part of the thrill (not joy, note) of reading Selby is the 'what comes next?' factor. Just when you think he's plummed the depths of his characters deviant behaviour, off he goes again.

And i bet Harry Blacks not your real name, you cheeky scamp!
TimSpong
Joined 6 Nov 2006
1783 comments
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:10
How on earth did we end up with a Selby vs Murakami deathmatch!

Brilliant!

My money is on Murakami - his long distance running will give him a stamina edge over the less healthy Junior. That said, Hubert is a nasty, street fighter.

Personally, I'd like to add Franz Kafka to the list - mainly because he's a good writer but also because of his ability to transform people into insects.

FIGHT!
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:14
Tim Smith wrote:
How on earth did we end up with a Selby vs Murakami deathmatch!

screw kafka. you want to have Mary (Chun Li) Shelley in there to kick soem serious butt Frankenstein stylee!

Tim Smith wrote:
FIGHT!


FINISH HIM!
DoctorDee
Joined 3 Sep 1999
2130 comments
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:33
Tim Smith wrote:
Personally, I'd like to add Franz Kafka to the list - mainly because he's a good writer but also because of his ability to transform people into insects.

In the books that people carry around without ever reading stakes. Franz Kafka is the undisputed champion.

OptimusP
Joined 13 Apr 2005
1174 comments
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:33
DoctorDee wrote:
Tim Smith wrote:
Personally, I'd like to add Franz Kafka to the list - mainly because he's a good writer but also because of his ability to transform people into insects.

In the books that people carry around without ever reading stakes. Franz Kafka is the undisputed champion.


I believe Sun Tzu's "Art of War" and Machiavelli's "De Re Militari" could challenge that, especially with bussiness people, oh, and the Koran!
TimSpong
Joined 6 Nov 2006
1783 comments
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:43
DoctorDee wrote:
In the books that people carry around without ever reading stakes. Franz Kafka is the undisputed champion.


Wrong. I've read The Trial and (The) Metamorphosis. The undisputed champeen is James Joyce. Hands-down, no question. Sitting further down the league table would be Salman Rushdie and Stephen Hawking.

Cheers

Tim
DoctorDee
Joined 3 Sep 1999
2130 comments
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:55
Tim Smith wrote:
Wrong. I've read The Trial and (The) Metamorphosis. The undisputed champeen is James Joyce. Hands-down, no question.

Proves nothing. You've also read Joyce.

No one carries round those other Authors you mentioned, but which ihave already forgotten the names of.

<< Prev12

Log-in or register to permanently change your layout setting.