007 Blood Stone, Level Designer Peter Collier

> Editorial Comments > SPOnG Comments Index

Topic started: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:36
Click here to view the editorial this topic refers to.
connery
Anonymous
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:36
this interview is so yawn... another brilliant article from spong... i wonder why youre not as popular as eurogamer, or popular at all...
TimSpong
Joined 6 Nov 2006
1783 comments
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:40
@connery - How about some actual criticism pal? Because frankly this sort of tedious, pointless 'commentary' is a waste of everybody's energy. I'd suggest you either contribute something positive or you just go and do some salmon fishing somewhere quiet.
TimSpong
Joined 6 Nov 2006
1783 comments
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:40
@connery - How about some actual criticism pal? Because frankly this sort of tedious, pointless 'commentary' is a waste of everybody's energy. I'd suggest you either contribute something positive or you just go and do some salmon fishing somewhere quiet.
connery
Anonymous
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:59
salmon fishing? maybe it's that kind of wit that makes this site so great
Dreadknux
Joined 14 Jul 2004
700 comments
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:17
connery wrote:
salmon fishing? maybe it's that kind of wit that makes this site so great


I think the fact you're still here shows that you have no interest in offering anything constructive and every interest in being a negative pillock. I don't normally address people who just want to sling unwarranted and unnecessary insults around - and your command of the English language and grammar doesn't really show a respect for the written word, if I'm being honest - but I'm curious about a few things.

1. What exactly about this article has got you in such a tizzy?
2. How exactly is this any different from other interviews elsewhere?
3. Were you expecting something tabloid, perhaps?
4. Did we do something to offend you in a past life?

Cheers
Svend
connery
Anonymous
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:43
1. the interview is boring
2. on one level it's not different, which is a problem in itself. on another level the quality of the writng and the questions make no one in their right mind want to read it.
3. something tabloid? you mean you think this is some masterpiece? tabloid would have been better.
4. probably.

also, Svend, your command of 'the English language and grammar' leaves a lot to be desired. as if people bother speaking properly in comments anyway.

i'm only still here coz it's humourous to see that this thread of a few comments in the longest on this site and i'm wondering how long it'll get.
Dreadknux
Joined 14 Jul 2004
700 comments
Sat, 25 Sep 2010 07:22
Thanks for answering the questions, although they were neither helpful or constructive. And again, insults won't really get you any respect. I don't think you can put yourself on any pedestal of literary greatness when you admitted that you're simply a troll. This is far from the longest comments thread, by the way.

So I'll leave it at this, thank you once again for your input, and realise that we can't please everyone with every editorial. Some features are fun and witty, others are more informative. You wanted the former, by your own admission, when we provided the latter. To call it outright 'boring' and imply that it is worthless as a result is more than a little bit harsh. But that's your prerogative.

But hey, at the very least we bothered to respond to your comments directly, eh? See you around.

Cheers
Svend

Log-in or register to permanently change your layout setting.